VASP TrackerBrazil · Central Bank (SPSAV)
English
Menu
Source: Banco Central do Brasil open data (authorisation processes) · reference date 30/09/2026 · checked on 20 Oct 2026, 23:59 BRT

Brazil / Analysis

Analysis

Brazil vs MiCA vs UK: how crypto licensing compares

Minimum capital, deadlines, transition and scope across the three regimes, from the official texts.

Brazil, the European Union and the United Kingdom all require crypto firms to be licensed, but they differ on minimum capital, transition deadlines and what happens to firms still under review. The table uses only each regime's official texts; amounts are in local currency, not converted.

Brazil (BCB)European Union (MiCA)United Kingdom (FCA)
Legal basisLaw 14,478/2022; Res. BCB 520 and 519Regulation (EU) 2023/1114FSMA 2000 (Cryptoassets) Regulations 2026 (FCA)
AuthoriserBanco Central do BrasilNational competent authority of each member stateFinancial Conduct Authority
Licence typesSPSAV intermediary, custodian or broker (Res. 520, art. 4)CASP; services grouped into 3 capital classes (Annex IV)Activity-based permissions (e.g. safeguarding, trading platform, dealing)
Minimum capitalSet by activity (Joint Res. 14/2025); brokers and custodians: BRL 8.0m to 37.2m (BCB); for SPSAVs, BRL 10.8m to 37.2m per BMA Advogados (secondary)EUR 50k, 125k or 150k by class (Annex IV / ESMA)GBP 75k to 750k by activity (permanent minimum requirement, PS26/12)
Deadline for existing firmsFile by 30 Oct 2026 (IN 704, art. 9)Transition until 1 Jul 2026 at the latest; states could shorten it (art. 143(3))Window 30 Sep 2026 to 28 Feb 2027 (FCA direction)
While under reviewTimely filers continue until decided (art. 88, §6)Transition over: unlicensed service breaches EU law (ESMA)Firms applying in the window may continue until decided (FCA)
Non-filersStop within 30 days after the deadline (art. 88, §7)Must execute an orderly wind-down plan (ESMA)May have to cease activities until authorised (FCA)
Full application2 Feb 2026 (Res. 520 in force)30 Dec 2024 (CASP titles)25 Oct 2027
Transition timelinesBrazil: filing window (270 days) 2026-02-02–2026-10-30; EU (MiCA): transition (art. 143) 2024-12-30–2026-07-01; UK: window 2026-09-30–2027-02-28Transition timelines: Brazil, EU (MiCA) and UK2025202620272028Brazilfiling window (270 days)30 Oct 2026 deadline29 Nov non-filers stopEU (MiCA)transition (art. 143)1 Jul 2026 transition endsUKwindow28 Feb 2027 window closes25 Oct 2027 regime startsSources: Res. BCB 520; Reg. (EU) 2023/1114 art. 143; FCA direction of 20 Feb 2026. VASP Tracker, CC BY 4.0.
Figure 1. Transition timelines compared. Download: SVG · PNG (CC BY 4.0)

Capital: Brazil asks for more

Minimum capital is now set by the activities a firm carries out, under the methodology of CMN/BCB Joint Resolution 14/2025. In BCB's 3 Nov 2025 presentation, brokers and custodians fall between BRL 8.0 million and BRL 37.2 million (BCB); for SPSAVs, law firm BMA Advogados cites BRL 10.8 million to 37.2 million (secondary source). There is a phase-in for institutions already operating (25% of the difference until 31 Dec 2026, 100% from 2028, art. 12). Under MiCA the floor is EUR 50,000 to 150,000 (Annex IV). In the UK the permanent minimum requirement runs from GBP 75,000 (dealing as agent, arranging deals) to GBP 750,000 (dealing as principal) (FCA PS26/12); the binding requirement is the highest of that floor, the fixed-overheads requirement and the K-factors.

Transition: three calendars

The EU moved first: MiCA has applied to service providers since 30 Dec 2024 and the transition ended on 1 Jul 2026 in every member state (ESMA). Brazil closes its filing window on 30 Oct 2026. The UK opened its window on 30 Sep 2026 and the regime starts on 25 Oct 2027 (FCA).

Firms under review

In Brazil, timely filers may keep operating (Res. 520, art. 88, §6), but since Res. 589 the ban on banks (art. 91) no longer exempts firms in process. In the UK, the FCA says firms that apply within the window can continue, including taking on new business, while their application is assessed (FCA). In the EU the transition is over and there is no continuity without a licence.

A simplified comparison of official texts; each regime has exceptions. Not legal advice.

Sources

  1. Lei 14.478/2022 www.planalto.gov.br
  2. Resolução BCB 520/2025 www.bcb.gov.br
  3. Resolução BCB 589/2026 www.bcb.gov.br
  4. IN BCB 704/2026 www.bcb.gov.br
  5. Resolução Conjunta CMN/BCB 14/2025 www.bcb.gov.br
  6. BCB · apresentação capital mínimo (03/11/2025) www.bcb.gov.br
  7. BMA Advogados · resumo Res. 519–521 www.bmalaw.com.br
  8. Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCA) eur-lex.europa.eu
  9. ESMA · MiCA Annex IV www.esma.europa.eu
  10. ESMA · MiCA art. 143 www.esma.europa.eu
  11. ESMA · statement on end of transitional periods www.esma.europa.eu
  12. FCA · application period direction (20/02/2026) www.fca.org.uk
  13. FCA · cryptoasset regime overview www.fca.org.uk
  14. FCA · press release 30/09/2026 www.fca.org.uk
  15. FCA · PS26/12 prudential regime www.fca.org.uk

Cite this

VASP Tracker, “Brazil vs MiCA vs UK: how crypto licensing compares”, BCB data as of reference date 30/09/2026, https://vasptracker.com/en/br/analysis/brazil-mica-uk-compared/ (accessed 20 Oct 2026).

Found an error? Report a correction · Corrections · Figures and data under CC BY 4.0.